Has anyone else noticed that those with visual snow who do not suffer have been excluded from the studies?
Has anyone else noticed that given the traffic on this site nowadays it would appear the a large proportion of past members were merely puppet accounts, and so therefore, by extrapolation, the thousands of accounts on subsequent sites on this subject must also be... puppets?
Does it not seem strange that "all" media surrounding this condition is purposely kept negative when I know from a lifetime of experience that this is false?
When not one single medical journal can equate Visual Snow with any sort of malady, do the words "disease", "syndrome", and "dysfunction" really apply?
Just food for thought my fellow neuronaughts.